DNA set to expose illegal dog foulers

Glasgow’s high profile campaign against litter louts has produced some impressive results since launching two years ago, with more than 11,000 fines issued.
 
But are the city fathers committed to the cause enough to replicate the latest civic clean up initiative from Germany, DNA testing for dogs.

For if the German experience is successful it could well be the city’s dog owners who are next in the sights of the Council's cleanliness police.

Last month, lawmaker Peter Stein from Rostock in eastern Germany became the latest politician to call for DNA testing of dog poo in order to identify the canine culprit and fine owners for not picking up after their pooch.

Stein, a conservative Christian Democratic state parliamentarian in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, said that under his proposal, officials would test the faeces and then match it up with the offending dog using a DNA database of all canines.

Currently, German dog owners are fined 30 to 40 Euros if they fail to clean up after their pets but very few people are ever caught. Only four fines were given out in Stein's hometown last year. The city has 200,000 residents and 6,500 registered dogs.

If he is successful though, it may be Scotland's east coast which follows the German lead first.

The performance of Edinburgh's environmental wardens is lamentable. Each of the city’s 32 strong team of wardens issued just one fine every quarter for dog fouling, despite widespread complaints about the problem. The wardens cost the council around £600,000 per year but make less than three per cent of that money back from issuing the £50 fixed penalty notices.

But with it estimated to cost up to 200 Euros per dog to register and process, critics complain DNA itesting is not the most cost effective way of dealing with a problem that many see as the most anti social of all littering offences.

Yes, according to Mr Stein and it’s the dog owners who will pick up the tab.
 
“The cost will naturally fall to the dog owners,” Stein was reported in saying in De Bild newspaper.

So as well as the vet bills, pedigree chum and the annual kennel charge, responsible owners may soon be stumping up to introduce a system aimed at cracking down on the shortcomings of those less conscientious so called dog lovers.

But with the German state parliament also considering giving a 20 Euro reward to people who report on dirty dogs and their owners, they might not see the idea as quite as barking after all.


 

 
Comments (1)
1 Tuesday, 08 November 2011 18:19
Mrs Deloris Holness
Dog Fouling is not just disgusting to see but it is also dangerous. A friend experienced the loss of a baby at 32 weeks. She contracted the P Virus carried by dogs when her five year old daughter came home sick from School. Her daughter had picked up the virus through outdoor play or somewhere on the school premises (brought in by shoes)and as a result became violently sick. My friend - who was obviously in contacted with her infected child-started being sick. Agains she vomited violently numerous times. After admitance to hospital her baby was later delivered stillborn. Test showed it was due to contracting the P Virus (Parvo Virus-I'm not sure how it spelt). Dogs foul outside and inside of parks, and around schools which is dangerous to childrens health. My friend is a perfect example of why this public nuisance need to be taken more seriously. I read about the German DNA system a while back and I fully support its implentation to the United Kingdom. I think if you want to keep dogs you should take responsiblity for their public toileting and in failing to do so you pay for it.

Add your comment

Your name:
Your email:
Subject:
Comment:
website by ifoundry